By D. Leith
Read Online or Download A Social History of English PDF
Similar language & grammar books
English phrases: background and constitution is worried essentially with the realized vocabulary of English, the phrases borrowed from the classical languages and French. it really is either an advent to a couple of the elemental rules of linguistic research and a worthwhile guide for vocabulary discernment and enrichment.
Language constitution and use are mostly formed by means of cognitive procedures resembling categorizing, framing, inferencing, associative (metonymic), and analogical (metaphorical) pondering, and – mediated via cognition – by way of physically adventure, emotion, conception, motion, social/communicative interplay, tradition, and the inner ecology of the linguistic process itself.
This advisor offers research-based techniques that allow secondary academics to extend adolescent studying whereas assembly criteria by means of incorporating studying, writing, and significant considering into content material guideline.
Even though there's a contingent of linguists who struggle the very fact, our language is usually changing--not basically via slang, yet sound, syntax, and phrases' meanings in addition. Debunking the parable of "pure" general English, tackling arguable positions, and eschewing politically right arguments, linguist John McWhorter considers speech styles and nearby accents to illustrate simply how the adjustments do take place.
- Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges
- Essays in Arabic Dialectology
- Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity
- Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact)
- Linguistics of the Himalayas and Beyond
- The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies
Extra info for A Social History of English
Before the printing press, spelling habits were characterised by spectacular diversity. When we look up a word in the Oxford English Dictionary, we are immediately confronted by a bewildering range of spellings. There are two main reasons for this. First, scribes wrote in their own dialects, so there were different spelling systems in different parts of the country. Second, scribes were more often guided by their own speech-habits than by written precedent, which meant that changes in pronunciation were often mirrored in spelling.
The concept of Standard English makes most sense when we limit discussion to the written word. It is not only that speech, by its very nature, is less amenable than writing to being fixed. Writing can be seen to be an indispensable component of standardisation. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine the process without the existence of a written form. At the same time, the existence of a writing system does not presuppose the existence of a standard, as we saw in the last chapter. But once a particular variety has become dominant, writing is a powerful agent for its dissemination especially as literacy spreads and printing makes written materials more readily available.
Moreover, some poets like Spenser and Sydney had written works that many felt were a match for any literature. And with this new-found selfconfidence came a self-conscious delight in the flamboyant manipulation of stylistic levels. We can see this in the way Shakespeare sets off the native English idiom against the polysyllabic Latin one, by associating them with different kinds of character, or different moods. Also, he dramatises such differences of vocabulary, either by juxtaposing them within the same speech, or by intensifying a dramatic moment with the most simple language.